Saving Seafood

  • Home
  • News
    • Alerts
    • Conservation & Environment
    • Council Actions
    • Economic Impact
    • Enforcement
    • International & Trade
    • Law
    • Management & Regulation
    • Regulations
    • Nutrition
    • Opinion
    • Other News
    • Safety
    • Science
    • State and Local
  • News by Region
    • New England
    • Mid-Atlantic
    • South Atlantic
    • Gulf of Mexico
    • Pacific
    • North Pacific
    • Western Pacific
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Fishing Terms Glossary

VINEYARD WIND: Notice to Mariners and Fishermen No. 16

August 23, 2019 โ€” The following was released by Vineyard Wind:

We wanted to let you know that the School for Marine Science and Technology (SMAST) and the Massachusetts Lobstermenโ€™s Association (MLA) are coordinating a lobster ventless trap survey in the northern section of the Vineyard Wind lease area as well as a control area to the east.

The survey is ongoing through October 2019.

View the full notice here.

Trawls are set in East/West direction and are configured in 8 pot strings approximately 1,200 feet long marked with double highflyers and double large Go Deep buoys labeled MLA/SMAST, DA19-017.

We encourage fishermen who may be working in the survey area to contact the captains directly or contact the following:

Beth Casoni โ€“ MA Lobstermenโ€™s Association, Phone: 508-738-1245

Crista Bank โ€“ FL Vineyard Wind, Phone: 508-525-0421

Vineyard Wind is committed to communicating and working with the local fishermen in the region during all stages of development of the proposed offshore wind farm.

Read the full release here

Wind turbines and radar mix poorly

August 22, 2019 โ€” As budding offshore wind development brings the U.S. to the brink of a new chapter in energy production, questions remain as to how radar interference caused by wind turbines will be diminished or eliminated.

Vineyard Windโ€™s 84-turbine wind farm, slated for an Atlantic lease area about 15 miles south of Marthaโ€™s Vineyard, effectively had the rug pulled out from underneath it August 9, when the Department of the Interior announced the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) would hold off signing a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and re-examine potential impacts posed by the project. Radar was not specifically cited as something the feds would take a second look at. However, weather and aeronautical radar are all well-documented as being adversely affected by wind turbines, and a handful of studies show marine radar is also hampered by wind turbines. Fishermen who spoke with The Times said they already work in an inherently dangerous industry, and offshore radar interference has the potential to exacerbate that danger.

Technological measures to lessen radar interference from turbines are being researched and slowly implemented in the U.S. and Europe. However, none appear to be folded into the construction plans for Vineyard Wind. In its Revised Navigation Risk Assessment, Vineyard Wind borrowed from a 2009 U.S. Coast Guard review for the never-realized Cape Wind project, and stated for its own project, โ€œimpacts to radar should not negatively impact a marinerโ€™s ability to safely navigate in the [wind development area]; even so, Vineyard Wind will work with stakeholders to identify potential mitigation measures, as necessary.โ€

Read the full story at the MV Times

MASSACHUSETTS: Vineyard Wind project gains bipartisan support from federal lawmakers

August 22, 2019 โ€” A bipartisan call for federal officials to move quickly on permits for the Vineyard Wind offshore wind project came Monday from the stateโ€™s congressional leaders along with colleagues from Louisiana.

โ€œWe believe it is possible for multiple industries to coexist in mixed use regions offshore,โ€ the lawmakers said in their letter to Interior Secretary David Bernhardt and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross. โ€œWe urge your departments to work together to find a solution that will address concerns raised by stakeholders, protects the environment, and allows the Vineyard Wind project to remain viable.โ€

The call from federal officials echoes the intent of a rally held Thursday at Cape Cod Community College in West Barnstable, where conservationists joined with other Vineyard Wind supporters โ€” such as union members, business people and faith groups โ€” in a call for a break in the logjam.

Read the full story at the New Bedford Standard-Times

Politicians Call for Action on Offshore Wind Project

August 21, 2019 โ€” Massachusetts congressional leaders are asking federal officials to move quickly on permits for the Vineyard Wind offshore wind project.

Vineyard Wind has signed contracts to sell 800 megawatts of power a year to three Massachusetts electric utilities. The company planned to begin construction later this year off the Massachusetts coast.

A final environmental impact statement and a record of decision on the companyโ€™s plan was expected Friday.

Read the full story from the Associated Press at U.S. News

US lawmakers urge speedy Vineyard decision

August 20, 2019 โ€” A bipartisan group of senators are calling on US federal government to finalise the supplemental environmental impact statement (EIS) and mitigate delay to the first utility-scale offshore wind farm in US waters.

Massachusetts senators Edward Markey (Democrat) and Elizabeth Warren (Democrat), Louisiana senators Bill Cassidy (Republican) and John Kennedy (Republican), along with representatives Richard Neal, William Keating and Joseph Kennedy (Massachusetts), as well as Steve Scalise (Louisiana), have sent a letter to the Department of Interior and the Department of Commerce.

The letter is in response to the decision by Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management โ€“ the designated lead agency on offshore wind โ€“ will need to implement a supplemental EIS, before issuing a final EIS, which could significantly delay the 800MW Vineyard Wind offshore wind project, off the coast of Massachusetts.

Read the full story at ReNews

Vineyard Wind project faces permitting, construction delays

August 19, 2019 โ€” Connecticut Public Radio reported over the weekend that a final decision to approve the Vineyard Wind Project may not occur until the end 2020, adding a layer of doubt about when the offshore wind power project would actually start.

Last month, National Fishermen reported Vineyard Wind could miss its planned construction start of later this year due to the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Managementโ€™s delay in reviewing the 800-megawatt wind farm off the Massachusetts coast.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

Vineyard Wind says it will carry on amid new review

August 16, 2019 โ€” Offshore energy develop Vineyard Wind backpedaled this week from its earlier warnings, saying it intends to carry forward with plans for building 84 turbines in New England waters, even as a revised environmental review raises more questions about its future.

โ€œCompany shareholders have affirmed a commitment to deliver a proposed 800-megawatt wind farm off the coast of Massachusetts, albeit with a delayed project schedule,โ€ Vineyard Wind announced in statement days after the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management announced it would undertake a sweeping reassessment of environmental impacts.

That assurance stood in contrast to the earlier reaction from Vineyard Wind, when company officials learned BOEM would not be finalizing an environmental impact statement as they had hoped for by mid-July.

Read the full story at National Fisherman

Fisheries Survival Fund Supports Department of Interior Commitment to Scientific Review of Wind Farm Projects

August 16, 2019 โ€” The following was released by the Fisheries Survival Fund:

The Fisheries Survival Fund (FSF) supports recent efforts by the Department of the Interior to ensure that planned offshore wind developments receive a thorough environmental review, as required by law. We appreciate that President Trump and his Administration, and specifically Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt, have chosen to require that major offshore renewable energy development is based on sound science and takes the needs and interests of existing, historic coastal communities into account. Recognizing that major offshore wind development projects โ€” especially when so many are being planned all at onceโ€” fundamentally alter the ocean environment is sound policy and the right thing to do.

FSF has consistently stated that any offshore wind development needs to properly consider how new development affects exiting ocean users. This includes scallopers and all other fishermen, who rely on key fishing grounds that will be disrupted by new wind farms, as well as other ocean users who rely on these areas for transit.

Any prospective wind farm needs to properly account for the environmental impacts it would have on marine life and marine habitats, and the economic impacts it would have on fishermen and others relying on the areas. Only then can the benefits of any project be accurately assessed against the costs, and possible damages successfully mitigated.

Recent steps by the Department of the Interior closely follow our advice. In requiring a proper environmental review of existing wind farm proposals, the Department is holding the wind power industry to the same standards the fishing industry is whenever it implements a fishery management plan. To be clear, the Department is not imposing new or unique burdens. Rather, it is assuring that existing standards are met and proper procedures are followed. We are a nation governed by laws that apply to all, including renewable energy projects.

FSF still believes that it is possible for wind power and fisheries to coexist. But this coexistence canโ€™t happen without an honest and complete understanding of how this new industry will change our environment. We thank Secretary Bernhardt for his active engagement and thoughtful deliberation on this issue.

Fedsโ€™ delay puts crucial tax credit in jeopardy for Vineyard Wind

August 15, 2019 โ€” With the federal tax credit for offshore wind projects about to expire, every day counts.

So you can understand the concern around town when it became clear the countryโ€™s first major offshore wind farm would likely miss a crucial deadline for the tax credit, a key element in the projectโ€™s financing. The reason? The US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management said it needs more time to review Vineyard Windโ€™s 84-turbine wind farm, to properly weigh the cumulative impacts of similar offshore projects in the pipeline.

As a result, developer Vineyard Wind on Monday said it would revise its $2.8 billion project, with a delayed schedule. The vague statement from the developer, a Massachusetts venture owned by Avangrid and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, didnโ€™t say much. But these revisions likely mean one thing: Construction on the 800-megawatt project planned for waters south of Marthaโ€™s Vineyard would no longer start in time to deliver electricity by the end of 2021.

Read the full story at The Boston Globe

Sens. Warren And Markey Speak Out Against Vineyard Wind Decision

August 15, 2019 โ€” U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Edward J. Markey, both D-Mass., are speaking out against the recent federal decision to delay Vineyard Windโ€™s offshore project, proposed off the coast of Marthaโ€™s Vineyard, Mass.

Last week, the U.S. Department of the Interiorโ€™s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) decided to delay the publication of Vineyard Windโ€™s final environmental impact statement and, instead, initiate a supplemental draft environmental impact statement process.

โ€œThe Trump administrationโ€™s last-minute decision to delay approval of a major offshore wind energy project is extremely disappointing,โ€ states Warren. โ€œThe Vineyard Wind project โ€“ which is projected to create thousands of jobs and generate clean energy for over 400,000 families and businesses across the commonwealth โ€“ would save money for Massachusetts ratepayers, reduce carbon emissions by over 1.6 tons per year and help the commonwealth reach its clean energy targets by 2035.

Read the full story at North American Wind Power

  • ยซ Previous Page
  • 1
  • โ€ฆ
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • โ€ฆ
  • 43
  • Next Page ยป

Recent Headlines

  • Trump moves to roll back Bidenโ€™s strengthening of ESA protections
  • Federal court rules in favor of governmentโ€™s electronic tracking requirement for lobster fishing boats
  • Administration revises Endangered Species Act regulations to strengthen certainty, reduce burdens and uphold law
  • NORTH CAROLINA: NC fishermen challenge proposed blue crab cuts
  • ALASKA: Alaska crabbers steer toward a stronger future
  • Trump administration revives rollbacks of species protections from first term
  • ALASKA: After years of waiting, Alaskaโ€™s crab fleet is finally seeing disaster relief
  • Trump admin eyes deep-sea mining in CNMI, 100-plus miles offshore Guam

Most Popular Topics

Alaska Aquaculture ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BOEM California China Climate change Coronavirus COVID-19 Donald Trump groundfish Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Illegal fishing IUU fishing Lobster Maine Massachusetts Mid-Atlantic National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NEFMC New Bedford New England New England Fishery Management Council New Jersey New York NMFS NOAA NOAA Fisheries North Atlantic right whales North Carolina North Pacific offshore energy Offshore wind Pacific right whales Salmon South Atlantic Virginia Western Pacific Whales wind energy Wind Farms

Daily Updates & Alerts

Enter your email address to receive daily updates and alerts:
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Tweets by @savingseafood

Copyright ยฉ 2025 Saving Seafood ยท WordPress Web Design by Jessee Productions

Notifications