December 22, 2020 — The European Union is making a “final push” to strike a Brexit trade deal with Britain, although there are still deep rifts over fishing rights, the bloc’s chief negotiator said on Tuesday.
EU Negotiator Cites ‘Objective Risk’ of No Post-Brexit Deal
July 24, 2020 — British and European Union negotiators failed to agree on underlying principles in the latest round of talks on post-Brexit trade between the bloc and its one-time member, again raising concerns about far-reaching economic damage if no deal is reached by the end of the year.
In comments delivered after the talks ended Thursday, chief U.K. negotiator David Frost said it was clear the two sides wouldn’t meet their goal of reaching an understanding on “the principles underlying any agreement” this month.
“By its current refusal to commit to conditions of open and fair competition and to a balanced agreement on fisheries, the U.K. makes a trade agreement, at this point, unlikely,″ Barnier said at a press conference in London.
Britain is seeking a free-trade pact similar to one the EU recently negotiated with Canada. The EU wants to ensure both sides have similar rules on a wide range of issues, including workers’ rights, the environment and government subsidies, before it is willing to discuss such an agreement.
Britain also wants to regain control of fishing in its territorial waters, which have been governed by EU rules for more than 40 years. Foreign boats account for about 60% of the fish caught in U.K. waters.
Read the full story from the Associated Press at The New York Times
UK’s chief Brexit negotiator admits fishing deal is unlikely by July deadline
May 28, 2020 — Britain’s chief Brexit negotiator said it was unlikely that Britain and the EU would finalise a fisheries agreement by a July deadline on Wednesday, as Michel Barnier offered UK opposition parties an extension of up to two years on the transition period.
“I am beginning to think we might not make it by the 30th of June,” David Frost told MPs on parliament’s Brexit scrutiny committee the week before the next round of negotiations with the EU.
“We don’t regard fisheries as something that can be traded for any other bits of the negotiation. There is something very important happening at the end of the year which is that we get back control of our own waters,” he said
“Any agreements have simply got to accommodate that reality,” Boris Johnson’s top Brexit official said, as he described the divisions over the issue between the two sides.
EU fishing deal ‘far from acceptable’ to Scottish industry
November 20, 2018 — The industry had expected the UK to withdraw from the Common Fisheries Policy on the day of leaving the EU.
But the UK government has now agreed to be “consulted” on arrangements with the EU continuing to set quotas.
The Scottish Fishermen’s Federation said it falls “far short of an acceptable deal”.
The UK government has denied betraying its promise to “take back control” of the UK’s fishing waters after Brexit.
A spokesman for Prime Minister Theresa May said: “We have secured specific safeguards on behalf of British fishermen.”
He said the deal specified that in 2019 “there is a commitment that the UK’s share of the total catch cannot be changed”.
The spokesman added that, from 2020, “we’ll be negotiating as an independent coastal state and we’ll decide who can access our waters and on what terms”.
The UK and the EU said they had agreed on a “large part” of the deal that will lead to the “orderly withdrawal” of the UK.
Brexit negotiators Michel Barnier and David Davis said they had agreed terms for a transition period, calling the announcement a “decisive step”.
The transitional period is set to last from 29 March 2019 to December 2020, and is intended to smooth the path to a future permanent relationship.
Both the UK and the EU hope the terms of an agreement on the transitional period can be signed off by Prime Minister Theresa May’s fellow leaders at the EU summit this week.
Bertie Armstrong, of the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation, said the Scottish industry did not trust the EU to look after its interests.
Read the full story at BBC News
A spat about seafood shows the compromises that Brexit will force
July 5, 2017 — Britain’s fishing industry is a tiddler, contributing less than 0.1% of GDP. But the island nation has great affection for its fleet. During last year’s Brexit referendum campaign, a flotilla of trawlermen steamed up the Thames to protest against European Union fishing quotas. On July 2nd Michael Gove, the Brexiteer environment secretary (who claims that his father’s Aberdeen fish business was sunk by EU rules), announced that Britain would “take back control” of its waters by unilaterally withdrawing from an international fishing treaty.
Gutting such agreements is strongly supported by coastal communities. The pro-Brexit press cheered Mr Gove’s bold announcement. But landing a new deal for British fishermen will be legally complex, expensive to enforce, oblige Britain to observe European rules that it has had no hand in setting and, most likely, leave its businesses and consumers worse off than before. It is, in other words, a case study of the Brexit negotiations as a whole.
The EU’s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) was drawn up before Britain joined, to its disadvantage. But membership has allowed Britain to improve the policy. Countries’ quotas are now set on a basis that is more scientific than political. Unwanted fish can no longer be discarded at sea, which has helped to reverse the depletion of stocks.
Unpicking decades of tangled legal agreements will be harder than it looks. Mr Gove has initiated Britain’s withdrawal from the London Fisheries Convention. But Michel Barnier, the European Commission’s Brexit negotiator, argues that this 1964 agreement has since been superseded by the CFP. Regardless of these conventions, foreign fishermen may claim historic fishing rights going back decades or even centuries. Many of them have set up units in Britain to buy quotas from British fishermen. Unless the government overturns these property rights by decree, it may face a large compensation bill.