Saving Seafood

  • Home
  • News
    • Alerts
    • Conservation & Environment
    • Council Actions
    • Economic Impact
    • Enforcement
    • International & Trade
    • Law
    • Management & Regulation
    • Regulations
    • Nutrition
    • Opinion
    • Other News
    • Safety
    • Science
    • State and Local
  • News by Region
    • New England
    • Mid-Atlantic
    • South Atlantic
    • Gulf of Mexico
    • Pacific
    • North Pacific
    • Western Pacific
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Fishing Terms Glossary

CALIFORNIA: Capitol Tracker: Area reps take stand on landing fee hikes

March 28, 2017 โ€” Both of the stateโ€™s North Coast legislators, Sen. Mike McGuire and Assemblyman Jim Wood, are vocal in their opposition to a proposal put forward by the governor to increase fishing landing fees.

The plan from Gov. Jerry Brown to fill a $20 million shortfall in the stateโ€™s Department of Fish and Wildlife budget would increase landing fees for the stateโ€™s commercial fishing fleet. The increases would raise an additional $12.4 million.

โ€œCurrently, revenue from the commercial fish landing fees support less than one quarter of the Departmentโ€™s program costs,โ€ the budget summary states, adding that landing fees have not been adjusted for 20 years.

According to McGuire, the increase in the fees โ€œexceeding 10,000 percentโ€ is โ€œsimply unacceptable.โ€

โ€œWe have to protect and preserve Californiaโ€™s fisheries, and weโ€™re deeply concerned about the future based off of threats from the federal government and the exorbitant fees being proposed by the Governorโ€™s Office,โ€ McGuire said in a statement.

Wood reacted similarly.

โ€œAs Vice Chair of the Joint Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture and a member of the Assembly who represents nearly one-third of Californiaโ€™s coastline, I am adamantly opposed to the Governorโ€™s proposal to increase landing fees on commercial fisheries,โ€ Wood said in a statement.

He added that the fishing industry has not had it easy the past few years with toxic algae blooms halting the crab fishing season on the North Coast last year and salmon populations declining significantly.

โ€œExacerbating the financial hardships of an industry that has so recently suffered these crises in order to address the Department of Fish and Wildlifeโ€™s budget concerns is unconscionable,โ€ Wood wrote in a letter to the Joint Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture, which he co-chairs.

Read the full story at The Times-Standard News

Consider the Crab: The year Californiaโ€™s Dungeness crab industry almost cracked apart (but didnโ€™t)

July 28, 2016 โ€” Lori French, the daughter-in-law of a crab fisherman, the wife of another, and the mother of a third, placed two large bowls on a table. The one labeled โ€œCaliforniaโ€ sat empty. The other, reading โ€œOregon,โ€ was filled to the brim with bright-lavender-and-orange Dungeness crabs. It was early February, the night before the annual hearing of the Joint Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture at the state capitol, and French, whoโ€™s the president of a nonprofit called Central Coast Women for Fisheries, had organized a banquet that was part festive crab feed, part bare-knuckled lobbying effort.

For the benefit of her attendees, who included elected officials, bureaucrats, scientists, and fishermen and their families, she had shipped hundreds of pounds of Dungeness down from Oregon, where, unlike in California, the annual crab season was already under way. She believed that state officials were being too cautious in prohibiting commercial crabbing due to an outbreak of toxic domoic acid, an embargo that had decimated the fortunes of some 1,800 crab-fishing captains and crews in California. Domoic acid, she pointed out, had neither killed nor caused a reported sickening of anyone so far this year. Washington State had let commercial fishermen on the water. Why not reopen the waters in California?

It wouldnโ€™t be that easy. The California Department of Public Health requires scientists to confirm two consecutive clean tests for potentially harmful toxins in locally caught crabs. Since the fall, at least one of every two tests had reported unacceptably high levels of domoic acid, which can poison all kinds of sea life and can sicken and potentially kill humans. By the time I caught up with French again in mid-March, several weeks after the banquet, the stateโ€™s crabbers were still out of luck. One recent test had come back clear, French told me over the phone. With one more clean bill of health, her husband and hundreds of other fishermen working the coastline from Santa Barbara up to Crescent City would have been able to drop pots and catch crabs. But when the subsequent test results came back, they werenโ€™t good: A crab had been found with domoic acid levels in its organs at 38 parts per million, 8 above the cutoff level. French was devastated: โ€œOur last bit of hope was just jerked away,โ€ she said.

Read the full story at the San Francisco Chronicle

Dungeness crabbers likely to receive assistance

February 10, 2016 โ€”  Gov. Jerry Brown Tuesday informed U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker via a letter that the state of California was requesting federal declarations of a fishery disaster and commercial fishery failure in response to the continued presence of unsafe levels of domoic acid in Dungeness and rock crab across the state.

The governorโ€™s request Tuesday initiates an evaluation of a federal fishery resource disaster under the Interjurisdictional Fisheries Act of 1986 and a commercial fishery failure under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976.

By declaring a federal disaster, affected fisheries would be able to receive economic assistance for losses incurred.

Typically a $90 million industry for the state annually, Brown estimated in his letter that the continued closures would cost $48 million in losses for Dungeness crab, and $376,000 for rock crab, based on estimated values of both species during the time period of November 2015 through June 2016.

Because the crabbing season is likely to remain delayed or closed for the remainder of the 2015-16 season, Brown predicts these estimates to only increase.

Mendocino County fisheries have also reported at least $4 million in losses, according to Tami Bartolomei, county Office of Emergency Services coordinator, who updated the Board of Supervisors during its Feb. 2 meeting. Bartolomei said she expected to keep receiving additional disaster economic worksheet claims from local fisheries that go to the U.S. Small Business Administration.

County supervisors that day authorized Bartolomei to send a letter to the stateโ€™s Office of Emergency Services requesting that Mendocino County be included on a list of other affected California counties for declaration considered by the U.S. Small Business Administration.

The U.S. Small Business Administration has since announced it was offering federal disaster loans to state small businesses that have suffered financial losses as a result of the crab ban. Mendocino County is among the dozens of counties on the SBAโ€™s list of eligible areas.

North Coast Sen. Mike McGuire, also chairman of the state Joint Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture, will host another meeting Thursday as part of the 43rd annual Zeke Grader Fisheries Forum in Sacramento. The meeting was scheduled prior to Brownโ€™s letter, and will also cover the governorโ€™s request for crab disaster declaration.

Read the full story at the Daily Journal

Recent Headlines

  • Foreign food inspections plummet following Trump administration layoffs
  • ALASKA: Alaskaโ€™s commercial fishing workforce continues to shrink
  • Lobstermen push back on ASMFC overfishing claim
  • GEORGIA: Right whales return to Georgia coast
  • LOUISIANA: Grocery stores criticized by Louisiana senators for selling possibly tainted shrimp
  • NORTH CAROLINA: N.C. Coastal Fisheries Coalition expands advisory team, adopts resolutions on blue crab and sheepshead regulations
  • ICFA Urges COP30 Negotiators to Recognize Critical Role of Fisheries in Climate Action
  • Offshore wind fight lining lawyersโ€™ pockets

Most Popular Topics

Alaska Aquaculture ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BOEM California China Climate change Coronavirus COVID-19 Donald Trump groundfish Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Illegal fishing IUU fishing Lobster Maine Massachusetts Mid-Atlantic National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NEFMC New Bedford New England New England Fishery Management Council New Jersey New York NMFS NOAA NOAA Fisheries North Atlantic right whales North Carolina North Pacific offshore energy Offshore wind Pacific right whales Salmon South Atlantic Virginia Western Pacific Whales wind energy Wind Farms

Daily Updates & Alerts

Enter your email address to receive daily updates and alerts:
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Tweets by @savingseafood

Copyright ยฉ 2025 Saving Seafood ยท WordPress Web Design by Jessee Productions

Notifications