August 4, 2015 โ One was knocked overboard on a winter trip in the middle of the night, while another was handed a noose and told to hang himself. Their computers have been tossed into the sea, their bunks set up over a boatโs toilet, their water bottles tainted with tobacco spit.
The men and women who monitor the catch of New Englandโs once-mighty groundfishing industry, a job required by federal law to curb overfishing, have long had strained relationships with the fishermen who take them to sea.
Now, with federal funding for the controversial program set to run out this fall, the regionโs long-beleaguered fishermen are being told they have to pay for the observers themselves โ or they canโt fish.โ
โThis could be the final hit that pushes us into bankruptcy, causing the collapse of the whole fleet,โ said Phil Lynch, 45, a Scituate fisherman who has persisted while the number of groundfishing boats in the region has plummeted by more than 70 percent over the past decade. โThe guys still left will be gone.โ
The threat to the estimated 200 boats remaining, more than half of which are based in Massachusetts, became more palpable last week when the National Marine Fisheries Service denied an emergency request from the council that oversees New Englandโs fishing industry to suspend the observer program. The agency said fishermen who catch cod, flounder, and other bottom-dwelling fish will have to find a way to pay for the regionโs approximately 100 observers, who accompany them on about a quarter of their trips.
Fishermen insist they canโt afford to pay for the observers, especially after major cuts to their quotas. At a government-estimated cost of $710 every time an observer accompanies fishermen to sea, the program would cause most boats to operate at a loss, they say.
โTheyโve set up fishermen to fail, and now they want to monitor the failure,โ said Vito Giacalone, policy director of the Northeast Seafood Coalition, an advocacy group for commercial fishermen. โI believe theyโre out to put us out of business.โ