July 3, 2019 โ The article about Henry Bearโs acquittal suggested that the charges were based on the amount Bear exceeded his quota, which was inaccurate.
Bear was charged with fishing after reaching his elver individual fishing quota. The charge had nothing to do with the amount by which he exceeded his quota, but its emphasis in the headline and the article only contributes to misunderstanding of the violation, and the departmentโs obligation to regulate and enforce the quota system.
The quota system, implemented in 2014, is designed to manage this valuable resource and to ensure that Maine does not exceed its overall quota allotted by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. Maine has been able to retain this fishery because of its ability to manage and enforce the quota system and because of the compliance of harvesters.
This fishery today is worth more than $20 million to Maine.
In addition, Bearโs assertion that this investigation was a โpolitical hatchet jobโ is not just wrong, itโs an irresponsible, defamatory statement. The charges were filed based on evidence that indicated a violation of a law. Plain and simple.
The specific section of law, ยง6575-K, prohibits fishing after an individual fishing quota has been met.