Saving Seafood

  • Home
  • News
    • Alerts
    • Conservation & Environment
    • Council Actions
    • Economic Impact
    • Enforcement
    • International & Trade
    • Law
    • Management & Regulation
    • Regulations
    • Nutrition
    • Opinion
    • Other News
    • Safety
    • Science
    • State and Local
  • News by Region
    • New England
    • Mid-Atlantic
    • South Atlantic
    • Gulf of Mexico
    • Pacific
    • North Pacific
    • Western Pacific
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Fishing Terms Glossary

Jon Mitchell: Ban costing Port of New Bedford $500K a day

December 22, 2017 โ€” NEW BEDFORD, Mass. โ€” In a letter addressed to NOAA, Mayor Jon Mitchell said the Port of New Bedford could be losing nearly $500,000 a day because of the groundfishing ban.

Mitchell referenced analysis prepared by Professor Dan Georgiana of SMAST, which stated the 25-day-old ban caused as much as $12 million (to date) in damage to the port.

Mitchell filed his letter Wednesday, the final day in which comments regarding the ban could be submitted. Andrew Saunders, the attorney for Sector IX, the Carlos Rafael fishing division thatโ€™s prevented from groundfishing, also submitted a letter Wednesday.

โ€œItโ€™s no exaggeration to say that hundreds of lives in New Bedford have been disrupted by the NOAA decision,โ€ Mitchell wrote.

NOAA said it is still processing the submitted comments and wouldnโ€™t comment on any submissions.

Mitchell doubled down on his plea throughout the Rafael saga: That innocent third parties shouldnโ€™t be harmed for Rafaelโ€™s actions. NOAA Regional Administrator John Bullard revoked Sector IXโ€™s operational plan on Nov. 20, which banned Rafaelโ€™s fleet from groundfishing. Bullard, a former New Bedford mayor, backed his decision stating deficiencies lingered within the sector.

Mitchell, a former U.S. prosecutor, presented a legal argument that should have prevented the ban. He cited National Standard 8, which states any prevention of overfishing should take into account the extent of adverse economic effects.

โ€œI believe National Standard No. 8 would require due consideration of the socioeconomic impact that the notice of withdrawal of approval has on the member of Sector IX as well as the effected stakeholders in the Port of New Bedford,โ€ Mitchell wrote.

Read the full story at the New Bedford Standard Times

 

Recent Headlines

  • ASC launches ASC Farm Standard
  • US legislation would require FDA approval of foreign shrimp production facilities
  • MASSCHUSETTS: Two Guatemalan fisheries workers arrested in early-morning operation
  • Data now coming straight from the deck
  • ALASKA: Alaskaโ€™s 2025 salmon forecast more than doubles last year
  • Seafood sales at US retail maintain momentum, soar in April
  • US Wind Offers $20 Million to Local Fishermen under New Proposal
  • ALASKA: Projected 2025 Copper River sockeye commercial harvest nears 2 million fish

Most Popular Topics

Alaska Aquaculture ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BOEM California China Climate change Coronavirus COVID-19 Donald Trump groundfish Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Hawaii Illegal fishing IUU fishing Lobster Maine Massachusetts Mid-Atlantic National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NEFMC New Bedford New England New England Fishery Management Council New Jersey New York NMFS NOAA NOAA Fisheries North Atlantic right whales North Carolina North Pacific offshore energy Offshore wind Pacific right whales Salmon South Atlantic Western Pacific Whales wind energy Wind Farms

Daily Updates & Alerts

Enter your email address to receive daily updates and alerts:
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Tweets by @savingseafood

Copyright ยฉ 2025 Saving Seafood ยท WordPress Web Design by Jessee Productions

Notifications