Saving Seafood

  • Home
  • News
    • Alerts
    • Conservation & Environment
    • Council Actions
    • Economic Impact
    • Enforcement
    • International & Trade
    • Law
    • Management & Regulation
    • Regulations
    • Nutrition
    • Opinion
    • Other News
    • Safety
    • Science
    • State and Local
  • News by Region
    • New England
    • Mid-Atlantic
    • South Atlantic
    • Gulf of Mexico
    • Pacific
    • North Pacific
    • Western Pacific
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Fishing Terms Glossary

NOAA Requests Comment on a Change to Bluefin Regulations

July 24, 2017 โ€” CAPE COD, Mass. โ€” NOAA is seeking public comment regarding a request from the Cape Cod Commercial Fishermenโ€™s Alliance for an exemption from a regulation that prohibits having unauthorized gear on board while fishing for, retaining, or possessing a bluefin tuna.

In their application, the Alliance suggest that the use of electronic monitoring, already required by federal fishing authorities is a sufficient at-sea monitoring to verify that the catch of bluefin tuna occurred on authorized gear.

The regulation was designed to allow enforcement to not only verify that only the authorized gear type was used to catch the bluefin tuna, but also serves as an effort control for bluefin tuna as it limits the number of vessels that can actively pursue bluefin tuna to those with only authorized gear.

Read the full story at CapeCod.com

Dave Goethel takes case to US Supreme Court

July 13, 2017 โ€” After losing a lawsuit alleging a federal agency has imposed unfair regulations, Hampton fisherman David Goethel is taking his case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Cause of Action Institute, which is representing Goethel and a group of other fishermen pro bono, filed a petition to be taken up by the Supreme Court Tuesday. The suit was originally filed in U.S. District Court against the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and U.S. Department of Commerce in 2015. It alleges NOAA unfairly requires commercial groundfishermen to fund at-sea monitors to join them on fishing trips and observe their compliance with regulations. Groundfish include popular New England fishing species like cod and haddock.

A First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel in Boston affirmed a ruling in favor of NOAA and the DOC this spring. According to Cause of Actionโ€™s petition, the lower court erred in dismissing the case based on the original suit being filed well after a 30-day deadline for challenging the regulation. Cause of Action is arguing the ruling prevented the court from addressing the merits of the suitโ€™s argument โ€“ that fishermen believe it is unconstitutional for the government to force an industry to pay for its own policing.

Read the full story at the Portsmouth Herald

Lobstermen question the need for camera surveillance aboard vessels in Nova Scotia

June 26, 2017 โ€” Several Nova Scotia lobster fishermen voiced doubt over their support of the possible implementation of vessel video surveillance during a workshop held last week in Lockport, Nova Scotia.

Camera surveillance aboard fishing boats was the primary topic of discussion during the 22 June information session hosted by Canadaโ€™s Department of Fisheries and Oceans and organized by the Ecology Action Center. The session was attended by more than a hundred southwest Nova Scotia fishermen, many of whom were concerned that the technology posed a threat to their privacy, CBC News reported.

Speakers including a fisherman from British Columbia and a program manager from the Gulf of Maine Research Institute. Discussion focused on the use of camera surveillance as a means to monitor catch and to cut down on bycatch, in particular regional endangered species such as Atlantic cod and cusk. However, many fishermen claimed practices are already in place that do enough to provide proper catch assurances.

Port La Tour fisherman Wilford Smith noted that the industry is already self-reporting its bycatch in logbooks, and throwing at-risk species back.

Regarding the prospect of camera surveillance on boats, Smith said: โ€œWhat for? Weโ€™ve got nothing to hideโ€ฆWeโ€™re not keeping nothing secret,โ€ according to CBC News.

Spurred by insistence from main lobster-buying markets โ€“ including the United States, Europe and Asia โ€“ requiring evidence of the sustainability of imported seafood, the Nova Scotia lobster fishery obtained certification from the Marine Stewardship Council in 2015. As standards continue to evolve, though, the elements needed to prove the sustainability of catch is changing as well, and there arenโ€™t a lot of options beyond camera surveillance that are cost-effective, according to Susanna Fuller, senior marine co-ordinator at the Ecology Action Center. While video surveillance isnโ€™t being imposed upon Nova Scotia lobster fishermen, alternatives including at-sea observers will cost more, Fuller told CBC News.

Read the full story at Seafood Source

DON DeMARIA: Fair is fair: Everyone should get a monitor

June 26, 2017 โ€” Effective fisheries management requires cooperation between managers and fishermen. Cooperation involves a certain amount of trust. Managers must be able trust that data being provided by fishermen is correct, and fishermen must trust that managers are analyzing those data properly. It is a two-way street.

The councils and NMFS appear not to trust fishermen when they propose requiring vessel monitoring systems and electronic video monitoring to be installed on commercial fishing vessels. Basically, they are telling the fishermen we really donโ€™t trust you telling us where you were fishing and what you caught and discarded, so we are putting an ankle monitor on you and will have a video camera watching your every move.

I get the fish are a public resource deal โ€” those harvesting a public resource need to do it in an acceptable manner, and accurate data are required to manage the resource properly argument. Likewise, tax dollars are a public resource of sorts and should be monitored and managed properly. If NMFS and the councils really want to start down the path of distrust, then fishermen may want to consider doing the same. After all, we have a right to know how our tax dollars are being spent, and it is tax dollars that pay the salaries of NMFS staff and council members.

So, I am proposing that all NMFS personnel and council members wear a radio collar โ€” similar to what wildlife biologists use on bears, wolves, etc., so we know where they are 24 hours a day, just like a VMS does on a commercial fishing vessel. Letโ€™s call the radio collar something nice, like a Federal Employee Monitoring System. I know the radio collars will be a little awkward at first, but so is a VMS unit on a small open outboard vessel fishing the southern Gulf of Mexico with a reef fish permit, but it is required.

Read the full letter at National Fisherman

Feds Look to Improve Cod Catch Data With Electronic Monitors

June 25, 2017 โ€” Federal fishing regulators are working on new rules to try to get better information about the catch of cod and other valuable fish species in the Northeast.

The New England Fishery Management Council has approved a range of possible alternatives that could be developed to improve monitoring of groundfish. Groundfish include several important commercial species such as cod, haddock and sole.

The council says it wants to improve reliability and accountability of catch reporting. Catch data are important because they help prevent overfishing of species.

One alternative the council is considering is electronic monitoring. The council says electronic monitoring could be used as an alternative to human at-sea monitors who collect fishing data aboard ships.

Read the full story at NECN

NEFMC Selects Groundfish Monitoring Alternatives, Initiates FW 57

June 21, 2017 โ€” The following was released by the New England Fishery Management Council:

Following a review of written and oral public comments collected during the Feb. 17-April 3 scoping process, the New England Fishery Management Council today approved an extensive range of alternatives for development and further consideration in Groundfish Monitoring Amendment 23.

The Council identified the amendmentโ€™s purpose and need and then voted to include the following elements to achieve the purpose:

  • Electronic monitoring (EM) alternatives;
  • A dockside monitoring program option;
  • Alternatives to determine the total monitoring coverage rate, including reevaluating the 30% coefficient of variation (CV) precision standard and how it is applied, for example, on a fishery vs. stock level;
  • An option to facilitate knowing the total coverage rate at a time certain to assist sectors for business planning; and
  • Proposals to streamline and improve the sector weekly reporting process.

Regarding electronic monitoring, the Council voted to include the following items for further development and analysis within the range of alternatives:

  • EM as an approved alternative to at-sea monitors to directly estimate discards;
  • An audit-based approach where EM operates on 100% of the trips with a subset of hauls or trips reviewed to verify vessel trip reported discards; and
  • A maximized retention approach where EM verifies that all groundfish are landed and dockside monitoring is used to sample catch.

Read the full release here

NOAA Fisheries Announces Reimbursement Rate of 60 Percent for 2017 At-Sea Monitoring Costs in Groundfish Fishery

June 16, 2017 โ€” The following was released by NOAA:

Effective at-sea monitoring (ASM) programs are essential to the success and sustainability of Greater Atlantic Region fisheries. Groundfish vessels in the Greater Atlantic Region that participate in the sector program are required to carry a fisheries observer or an at-sea monitor for a portion of their trips. Fisheries observers are provided and typically paid for by the Federal government in the Standardized Bycatch Reporting Methodology (SBRM) program and at-sea monitors are partially paid for by industry in the at-sea monitoring program.

In 2016, industry began paying their portion of at-sea monitoring costs and NOAA Fisheries was able to reimburse 85 percent of industryโ€™s expenses for July 2016-April 2017. We used these funds to offset a portion of industryโ€™s costs of the groundfish ASM program through a grant administered by the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC). For fishing year 2017, there are remaining funds in the grant, and therefore we will continue the reimbursement program.

We estimate there is funding to reimburse 60 percent of ASM costs for the 2017 fishing year. 

Any sector trip beginning on or after May 1 is now eligible for reimbursement. 

We are committed to providing as much stability to sectors as possible, so we have based our reimbursement rate on one that we anticipate will be consistent through the entire fishing year.

More information about our regionโ€™s observer program.

The electronic monitoring of groundfish industry

June 13, 2017 โ€” Randy Cushman rises before dawn each day, drives down to his trawler at Port Clyde Harbor and meets his crew. They prep their boat and head out for another day of chasing flounder and halibut. These days, Cushman and his crew rest easier and sleep in a little later, thanks to the camera installed in the boatโ€™s wheelhouse.

โ€œWe used to have to take observers to help count our catch,โ€ said Cushman.

Regulations had required observers appointed to certain vessels by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association to help keep track of fish stock.

โ€œTaking an observer out with you is cumbersome,โ€ Cushman said. โ€œYou have to train them, get down to the boat an hour early. Sometimes they clash with the crew. And you have to worry about another body on your boat. The camera eliminates those issues. And there are a lot more advantages than that.โ€

For three years, Cushman has been participating in the Maine Coast Fishermanโ€™s Associationโ€™s Electronic Monitoring System pilot project. The project swaps out the observers with surveillance cameras in order to count fish and take other observations on board New England groundfish vessels.

In the groundfish industry, 15 percent of trips must be covered by observers. The data gleaned from those trips is then used to portray industry norms.

All legal fish are counted at the docks, but until recently only human observers could properly count fish that were thrown back in the ocean.

Read the full story at The Times Record

Peru Commits to Make National Vessel Tracking Data Publicly Available

June 9, 2017 โ€” SEAFOOD NEWS โ€” The Peruvian government made a commitment to make its national vessel tracking data publicly available through Global Fishing Watch, which provides the first global view of commercial fishing activity.

The commitment was announced at The Ocean Conference hosted by the United Nations in New York City and is the result of Oceanaโ€™s collaboration with the Peruvian government to increase transparency of commercial fishing in Peruโ€™s waters.

โ€œPeru has committed to join Global Fishing Watch as a demonstration of transparency,โ€ said Hรฉctor Soldi, Vice Minister of Fisheries and Aquaculture for Peruโ€™s Ministry of Production. โ€œThis technology platform, based on satellite data from fishing vessels to create a global vision of commercial fishing, enables anyone to follow fishing activity anywhere on the oceans. This is another demonstration of the Peruvian governmentโ€™s commitment to fight illegal activities at sea and promote the sustainable use of the extraordinary marine productivity on our coastline. The Peruvian government intends to make the utmost effort to achieve the sustainable management of our fisheries in order to increase its contribution to nutrition and global food security.โ€

Global Fishing Watch uses public broadcast data from the Automatic Identification System (AIS), collected by satellite and terrestrial receivers, to show the movement of vessels over time. Global Fishing Watch uses this information to track vessel movement and classify it as โ€œfishingโ€ or โ€œnon-fishingโ€ activity. While AIS is required for the largest vessels that catch a disproportionately large amount of fish, adding Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data, which is required by some governments, to the Global Fishing Watch platform will provide the world with an even clearer view of fishing activity on our oceans. Together, AIS and VMS data offer the most accurate and comprehensive dataset. The announcement today will improve the information available to governments, fishery managers, seafood suppliers and buyers, journalists, researchers, nonprofit organizations and citizens around the world.

โ€œOceana has worked closely with the Peruvian government to convey the importance of transparency on our oceans, especially with regard to fishing activities,โ€ said Patricia Majluf, Vice President of Oceana Peru. โ€œEveryone should have access to the most comprehensive data available to best manage our fisheries and protect our ocean resources. Combined with Peruโ€™s vessel tracking data, Global Fishing Watch will offer an invaluable depiction of what is happening in our waters. This is a huge step for Peru to emerge as a world leader in promoting transparency at sea.โ€

Funding partners for Global Fishing Watch include the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, Marisla Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, The Wyss Foundation, The Waterloo Foundation and Adessium Foundation. The Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies and The Wyss Foundation are also funders of Oceanaโ€™s work in Peru.

โ€œLeonardo DiCaprio Foundation supports efforts to restore balance to marine ecosystems across the globe,โ€ said Justin Winters, Executive Director of the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation. โ€œThere are far too many areas of our oceans on the brink of total collapse because of illegal and overfishing activity. In order to implement solutions that protect these vulnerable habitats and marine life, the global community needs to see what is actually happening beyond the horizon. International leaders should follow the leads of Indonesia and Peru to prioritize transparency at sea.โ€

โ€œWe applaud the commitments by Peru and Indonesia to release their previously private vessel tracking data and encourage other countries to follow their lead,โ€ said Jacqueline Savitz, Vice President for the United States and Global Fishing Watch at Oceana. โ€œTogether, with forward-thinking governments like these, we can bring greater transparency to the oceans. By publishing fishing data, governments and citizens can unite to help combat illegal fishing worldwide. With more eyes on the ocean, there are fewer places for illegal fishers to hide.โ€

โ€œBloomberg Philanthropiesโ€™ Vibrant Oceans Initiative supports a groundbreaking approach to reform both local and industrial fishing simultaneously. Our approach relies on and leverages transparency and accountability on the international, national and local levels,โ€ said Antha Williams, Head of Environmental Programs at Bloomberg Philanthropies. โ€œThese announcements from two of the worldโ€™s largest fishing nations are a significant, encouraging step. We hope that other countries will follow their lead.โ€

โ€œAround the world, we are seeing how countries that implement science-based policies are restoring the productivity of their fisheries and bringing life back to the seas,โ€ said Molly McUsic, president of the Wyss Foundation. โ€œThese commitments from Peru and Indonesia are milestones in the global movement toward healthier oceans. These commitments will improve transparency, enable better management and decision-making, and yield economic and environmental benefits.โ€

This story originally appeared on SeafoodNews.com, a subscription site. It is reprinted with permission.

Indonesia makes its fishing fleet visible to the world through Global Fishing Watch

June 8, 2017 โ€” This week, at the United Nationโ€™s Ocean Conference, the Republic of Indonesia becomes the first nation ever to publish Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) data revealing the location and activity of its commercial fishing fleet. The new data being made public on the Global Fishing Watch public mapping platform reveals commercial fishing in Indonesian waters and areas of the Indian Ocean where it had previously been invisible to the public and other nations.

Susi Pudjiastuti, the Minister of Fisheries and Marine Affairs for the Republic of Indonesia, is taking a bold step toward increasing transparency in her countryโ€™s fishing industry. Today she urges other nations to do the same.

โ€œIllegal fishing is an international problem, and countering it requires cross border cooperation between countries,โ€ says Minister Susi. โ€œI urge all nations to join me in sharing their vessel monitoring data with Global Fishing Watch. Together, we can begin a new era in transparency to end illegal and unreported fishing.โ€

Also at the UN Oceanโ€™s Conference, Global Fishing Watch has committed to host any countryโ€™s VMS data, calling on other governments to follow Indonesiaโ€™s lead. โ€œWe believe publicly shared VMS will become a powerful new standard for transparent operation in commercial fishing,โ€ says Paul Woods, Global Fishing Watch CEO and Chief Technology Officer for SkyTruth, a founding partner of Global Fishing Watch along with Oceana and Google. โ€œSkyTruth has been collaborating with the Indonesian government for the past two years to really understand their VMS data and find new ways for VMS to enhance their fisheries management.โ€

Working closely with Oceana toward a united goal of transparency at sea, Peru becomes the first nation to follow Indonesiaโ€™s lead. Vice Minister for Fisheries and Aquaculture, Hector Soldi, announced Peruโ€™s intent to publicly share their VMS data in Global Fishing Watch.

โ€œWe applaud the commitments made by Peru and Indonesia to publish their previously private vessel tracking data and encourage other countries to follow their lead,โ€ said Jacqueline Savitz, Senior Vice President for the United States and Global Fishing Watch at Oceana. โ€œTogether, with forward-thinking governments like these, we can bring even greater transparency to the oceans. By publishing fishing data and using Global Fishing Watch, governments and citizens can unite to help combat illegal fishing worldwide. With more eyes on the ocean, there are fewer places for illegal fishers to hide.โ€

Read the full story at Phys.org

  • ยซ Previous Page
  • 1
  • โ€ฆ
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • โ€ฆ
  • 32
  • Next Page ยป

Recent Headlines

  • Chesapeake Bay Foundationโ€™s Menhaden Blame Game Isnโ€™t Backed by CCB Findings
  • Warming water has varied impact on salmon populations
  • Report highlights problem of Mexican shrimp laundering, Sustainable Fisheries Partnership says more work needed
  • UK rejects total ban on bottom trawling in offshore marine protected areas
  • Council delays decisions on alternative fishing gear
  • Maryland offshore wind lawsuit to push ahead during shutdown
  • ALASKA: Alaska crab fishery shows signs of recovery after massive crash
  • Bering Sea snow crab fishery sees major TAC increase for 2025

Most Popular Topics

Alaska Aquaculture ASMFC Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission BOEM California China Climate change Coronavirus COVID-19 Donald Trump groundfish Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Hawaii Illegal fishing IUU fishing Lobster Maine Massachusetts Mid-Atlantic National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NEFMC New Bedford New England New England Fishery Management Council New Jersey New York NMFS NOAA NOAA Fisheries North Atlantic right whales North Carolina North Pacific offshore energy Offshore wind Pacific right whales Salmon South Atlantic Western Pacific Whales wind energy Wind Farms

Daily Updates & Alerts

Enter your email address to receive daily updates and alerts:
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Tweets by @savingseafood

Copyright ยฉ 2025 Saving Seafood ยท WordPress Web Design by Jessee Productions

Notifications