According to the study, Friend of the Sea Absolute Performance Score was better than all major sustainable aquaculture schemes operating at international level: Global GAP, Global Aquaculture Alliance (GAA), AquaGAP and also better than some bio standards such as Bio Suisse, Australia Certified Organic, and retailer standards such as Whole Foods Market and Marks & Spencer.
The study also concluded that Friend of the Sea’s standards are driving more change than Naturland, Bio Suisse, GAA, Label Rouge and Marks & Spencer. When all standards where compared according to their requirements for salmon aquaculture, Friend of the Sea scored second only to the bio Soil Association standard.
Dr Paolo Bray, director of Friend of the Sea explains: “Some Bio standards are more restrictive on animal welfare and nutritional aspects but as a consequence they might increase environmental impact and prevent achievement of sustainability.
“While it is clear that 'Bio' is not a valid alternative to 'sustainability', we are proud that our standard has often scored better than most of the major Bio standards. In particular salmon standards, according to this study, perform even better than Naturland”, Mr. Bray added.
“This is once more evidence of the reliability of Friend of the Sea standards. The international aquaculture industry has already appreciated the important added value provided by FOS certification as we have certified almost five times the amount of aquaculture production certified by all the bio standards worldwide”, Mr Bray concluded.
The study was released by the University of Victoria Seafood Ecology Research Group and it assessed 20 aquaculture certification standards. Only 18 of them have actually already been used during audits (the U.S. National Organic Standard and WWF's SAD – Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue are only drafts proposal at the time of the study) and some of them are only specific for one species or implemented only at a single nation level.